![]() ![]() A strict copyleft license - like the GNU GPL - might actually be more up your alley, since it would force anyone hoping to make a buck off your hard work to release their source code and allow others (you included) to do the same and make a buck off their hard work. An actually-FOSS license means there's at least some chance of the broader FOSS community keeping it alive, if only so that they can say "well hang on, Linux has awesome creative/multimedia tools, too - and we don't even have to pretend GIMP is one of them anymore".Īll that said, the MIT license is probably not the right fit for Storyboarder itself (but is certainly a good fit for the underlying libraries same with the ISC license) based on your criteria. goes belly-up, then its non-FOSS storyboard editor does, too. Not to mention the need to define what "educational institution" means.īeing concerned about preventing others from making money off this ("If we struggle to make it free, you can’t be paid") seems to also run counter to the stated reason for making it free in the first place ("We will make money from creating great stories, not selling overpriced niche software."). By charging $30 a seat for the "educational" version and wanting to forbid educational institutions from distributing the "free" version, you're punishing the Goonies-tolerant organizations for Goonies-intolerance. It's also problematic for educational institutions even if they happen to be tolerant of a little bit of colorful language here and there. Ardour is the usual example of software that's the former without being the latter (you can download the source code for free if you have the know-how to compile it yourself, but a donation is required to download the pre-built direclty-installable binary). That aside, you seem to be conflating "free as in speech" (FOSS) with "free as in beer" (freeware, or how most people treat WinRAR) in some parts of that writeup. Permissive BSD/MIT family licenses just give it up. Stallman at least swapped commercial viability out for the infectious nature of copyleft, intended to keep as much software free and shareable as possible. Compare the market caps of Oracle and Microsoft to Red Hat for an illustration of the comparative effectiveness of these models. ![]() The only business model that's viable is selling support. The problem, of course, is not that the source is available and people are free to tweak and understand what's happening on their own machines, but that the licenses which open-source programs grew up under made serious commercial sales effectively impossible. ![]() ![]() Commercial vendors have improperly conflated the distribution of source code with the complete inability to make any money from it. I personally think the unlimited redistribution clauses that are mandatory for "Open Source" licenses have caused some serious problems. I understand that in practice, ESR successfully muscled others out and claimed effective cultural ownership of the phrase, but that doesn't mean that no one else is allowed to try to stake their claim and see if it sticks. This is so natural that the intelligence community has a parallel definition of "open source" that refers to non-secret/publicly available intelligence sources. It's the natural phrase for software that doesn't keep its source secret (or "closed", a common synonym for secret). Quantum chemistry levine solution manual pdf."Open Source" is not a strange phrase. Student exploration doppler shift answers.rarĮxplorations in basic biology 12th edition answer key Pdf perspectives in.nutrition wardlaw 9th.edition WINDOWS 7 LOADER BY ORBIT30 AND HAZAR 32BIT 64BIT V1.2 Jurnalul unei iubiri de nicholas sparks pdf Goforfiles latest version free download from filehippo SAM Broadcaster 4.9.6 - Registration Key.rar Lubomir ftacnik - grandmaster repertoire 6 - the sicilian defence (quality chess 2010) - editable.pd Windows ce 6.0 igo primo igo my way map update 2013 north america Storyboard quick and storyboard artist studioį.is.a.an.screen.The. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |